4.5 Review

From dysfunctional endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling to neurodegeneration

Journal

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 171-183

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.03.021

Keywords

ER-mitochondria contacts; Neurodegeneration; Calcium and lipid metabolism; Inflammation; Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Funding

  1. Institut national de la sante et de la recherche medicate, Fondation de France [Engt 2012 00034508]
  2. AETIONOMY (Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking, EFPIA companies) [115568]
  3. Fondation Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle epiniere
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Investissements d'avenir) [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last years, contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria have attracted great attention in the study of cell homeostasis and dysfunction, especially in the context of neurodegenerative disorders. This is largely due to the critical involvement of this subcellular compartment in a plethora of vital cellular functions: Ca2+ homeostasis, mitochondrial dynamics, transport, bioenergetics and turnover, ER stress, apoptotic signaling and inflammation. An increasing number of disease-associated proteins have been reported to physically associate with the ER mitochondria interface, and cause structural and/or functional perturbations of this compartment. In the present review, we summarize current knowledge about the architecture and functions of the ER mitochondria contact sites, and the consequences of their alteration in different neurodegenerative disorders. Special emphasis is placed on the caveats and difficulties in defining the nature and origin of the highlighted defects in ER-mitochondria communication, and their exact contribution to the neurodegenerative process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available