4.3 Article

Acute psychophysiological stress impairs human associative learning

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 84-93

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.09.003

Keywords

Associative learning; Classical conditioning; Operant conditioning; Instrumental learning; Reward learning; Stress

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [491746]
  2. Leaders Opportunity Fund from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (FAS) [F13-03917]
  3. CIHR New Investigator Salary Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Addiction is increasingly discussed as a disorder of associative learning processes, with both operant and classical conditioning contributing to the development of maladaptive habits. Stress has long been known to promote drug taking and relapse and has further been shown to shift behavior from goal-directed actions towards more habitual ones. However, it remains to be investigated how acute stress may influence simple associative learning processes that occur before a habit can be established. In the present study, healthy young adults were exposed to either acute stress or a control condition half an hour before performing simple classical and operant conditioning tasks. Psychophysiological measures confirmed successful stress induction. Results of the operant conditioning task revealed reduced instrumental responding under delayed acute stress that resembled behavioral responses to lower levels of reward. The classical conditioning experiment revealed successful conditioning in both experimental groups; however, explicit knowledge of conditioning as indicated by stimulus ratings differentiated the stress and control groups. These findings suggest that operant and classical conditioning are differentially influenced by the delayed effects of acute stress with important implications for the understanding of how new habitual behaviors are initially established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available