4.5 Article

Difference in imaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration between early and late-onset amnestic Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 22-30

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.02.010

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Age of onset; Neuroimaging biomarkers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography imaging

Funding

  1. French Hospital Clinical Research Program [PHRC ADAGE 2008-A01213-52]
  2. A*MIDEX project - Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  3. association dechaines ton coeur
  4. Toulouse Hospital, France
  5. Aix-Marseille University
  6. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)
  7. Alzheimer Society of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroimaging biomarkers differ between patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and lateonset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Whether these changes reflect cognitive heterogeneity or differences in disease severity is still unknown. This study aimed at investigating changes in neuroimaging biomarkers, according to the age of onset of the disease, in mild amnestic Alzheimer's disease patients with positive amyloid biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. Both patient groups were impaired on tasks assessing verbal and visual recognition memory. EOAD patients showed greater executive and linguistic deficits, while LOAD patients showed greater semantic memory impairment. In EOAD and LOAD, hypometabolism involved the bilateral temporoparietal junction and the posterior cingulate cortex. In EOAD, atrophy was widespread, including frontotemporoparietal areas, whereas it was limited to temporal regions in LOAD. Atrophic volumes were greater in EOAD than in LOAD. Hypometabolic volumes were similar in the 2 groups. Greater extent of atrophy in EOAD, despite similar extent of hypometabolism, could reflect different underlying pathophysiological processes, different glucose-based compensatory mechanisms or distinct level of premorbid atrophic lesions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available