4.5 Article

Entorhinal tau pathology disrupts hippocampal-prefrontal oscillatory coupling during associative learning

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 151-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.024

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Preclinical Local field potentials; Trace eyeblink conditioning; Viral vector; Rats

Funding

  1. CIHR Operating Grant [133693]
  2. Alzheimer's Association New Investigator Research Grant [12-237032]
  3. CFI Leaders Opportunity Fund [25026]
  4. NSERC graduate fellowship
  5. CIHR graduate fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A neural signature of asymptomatic preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is disrupted connectivity between brain regions; however, its underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we tested whether a preclinical pathologic feature, tau aggregation in the entorhinal cortex (EC) is sufficient to disrupt the coordination of local field potentials (LFPs) between its efferent regions. P301L-mutant human tau or green fluorescent protein (GFP) was virally overexpressed in the EC of adult rats. LFPs were recorded from the dorsal hippocampus and prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex while the rats underwent trace eyeblink conditioning where they learned to associate 2 stimuli separated by a short time interval. In GFP-expressing rats, the 2 regions strengthened phase-phase and amplitude-amplitude couplings of theta and gamma oscillations during the interval separating the paired stimuli. Despite normal memory acquisition, this learning-related, inter-region oscillatory coupling was attenuated in the tau-expressing rats while prefrontal phase-amplitude theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling was elevated. Thus, EC tau aggregation caused aberrant long-range circuit activity during associative learning, identifying a culprit for the neural signature of preclinical AD stages. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available