4.6 Review

Is the blood-brain barrier really disrupted in all glioblastomas? A critical assessment of existing clinical data

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 184-191

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox175

Keywords

blood brain barrier; drug therapy; glioblastoma; magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. MIT/Mayo Physical Sciences Center for Drug Distribution and Efficacy in Brain Tumors [U54CA210180]
  2. Mayo Clinic SPORE in Brain Cancer [P50CA108961]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  4. Ivy Foundation
  5. NIH [RO1NS077921, R01 NS060752, R01 CA164371, U54 CA210180, U54 CA143970, U54 CA193489, U01CA220378]
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA220378] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) excludes the vast majority of cancer therapeutics from normal brain. However, the importance of the BBB in limiting drug delivery and efficacy is controversial in high-grade brain tumors, such as glioblastoma (GBM). The accumulation of normally brain impenetrant radiographic contrast material in essentially all GBM has popularized a belief that the BBB is uniformly disrupted in all GBM patients so that consideration of drug distribution across the BBB is not relevant in designing therapies for GBM. However, contrary to this view, overwhelming clinical evidence demonstrates that there is also a clinically significant tumor burden with an intact BBB in all GBM, and there is little doubt that drugs with poor BBB permeability do not provide therapeutically effective drug exposures to this fraction of tumor cells. This review provides an overview of the clinical literature to support a central hypothesis: that all GBM patients have tumor regions with an intact BBB, and cure for GBM will only be possible if these regions of tumor are adequately treated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available