4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Low aspect ratio micropores for single-particle and single-cell analysis

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 36, Issue 9-10, Pages 1164-1171

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201400570

Keywords

Low aspect micropores; Resistive pulse sensing; Single-cell analysis

Funding

  1. Human Frontier Science Program Young Investigator Award [RGY0075/2009-C]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1435000] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes microparticle and bacterial translocation studies using low aspect ratio solid-state micropores. Micropores, 5 m in diameter, were fabricated in 200 nm thick free-standing silicon nitride membranes, resulting in pores with an extremely low aspect ratio, nominally 0.04. For microparticle translocation experiments, sulfonated polystyrene microparticles and magnetic microbeads in size range of 1-4 m were used. Using the microparticle translocation characteristics, we find that particle translocations result in a change only in the pore's geometrical resistance while the access resistance remains constant. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of our micropore to probe high-resolution shape information of translocating analytes using concatenated magnetic microspheres. Distinct current drop peaks were observed for each microsphere of the multibead architecture. For bacterial translocation experiments, nonflagellated Escherichia coli (strain HCB 5) and wild type flagellated Salmonella typhimurium (strain SJW1103) were used. Distinct current signatures for the two bacteria were obtained and this difference in translocation behavior was attributed to different surface protein distributions on the bacteria. Our findings may help in developing low aspect ratio pores for high-resolution microparticle characterization and single-cell analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available