4.3 Article

Strengthening quitter self-identity: An experimental study

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1229-1250

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1478976

Keywords

smoking; identity; future selves; social support; writing exercise; vignettes

Funding

  1. Leiden University, Department of Social and Organizational Psychology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Smoking-related self-identity processes are important for smoking cessation. We examined whether quitter self-identity (i.e. identification with quitting smoking) could be strengthened through a writing exercise, and whether expected social support for quitting, manipulated through vignettes, could facilitate identification with quitting. Design: Participants (N = 339 daily smokers) were randomly assigned to a 2 (identity: strengthened quitter self-identity vs. control) x 3 (social support: present vs. absent vs. neutral control) between-participants design. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was post-test quitter self-identity. Results: Post-test quitter self-identity was not strengthened successfully. Only a small and marginally significant intervention effect was found on quitter self-identity, which did not generalise to positively influence quit-intention or behaviour. The social support manipulation did not facilitate quitter self-identity. Secondary content analyses showed that quitter self-identity was strengthened among participants who linked quitting smoking to their lifestyle, wanted to become quitters for health reasons, and whose reasons for becoming quitters included approach of positive aspects of quitting, but not among participants who linked quitter self-identity to their self-perceptions. Conclusions: Results provide insight into the content of smokers' self-conceptualizations as quitters. Writing exercises should be improved and tested to eventually successfully strengthen quitter identities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available