3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Neural Network Architecture Combining Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) for Intrusion Detection in Network Traffic Data

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3195106.3195117

Keywords

artificial intelligence; artificial neural networks; gated recurrent units; intrusion detection; machine learning; recurrent neural networks; support vector machine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) is a recently-developed variation of the long short-term memory (LSTM) unit, both of which are variants of recurrent neural network (RNN). Through empirical evidence, both models have been proven to be effective in a wide variety of machine learning tasks such as natural language processing, speech recognition, and text classification. Conventionally, like most neural networks, both of the aforementioned RNN variants employ the Softmax function as its final output layer for its prediction, and the cross-entropy function for computing its loss. In this paper, we present an amendment to this norm by introducing linear support vector machine (SVM) as the replacement for Softmax in the final output layer of a GRU model. Furthermore, the cross-entropy function shall be replaced with a margin-based function. While there have been similar studies, this proposal is primarily intended for binary classification on intrusion detection using the 2013 network traffic data from the honeypot systems of Kyoto University. Results show that the GRU-SVM model performs relatively higher than the conventional GRU-Softmax model. The proposed model reached a trainin g accuracy of approximate to 81.54% and a testing accuracy of approximate to 84.15%, while the latter was able to reach a train in g accuracy of approximate to 63.07% and a testing accuracy of approximate to 70.75%. In addition, the juxtaposition of these two final output layers indicate that the SVM would outperform Softmax in prediction time-a theoretical implication which was supported by the actual training and testing time in the study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available