3.8 Article

Interparticle Bonding of Cu Powder under Repetitive Unidirectional Friction

Journal

TRIBOLOGY ONLINE
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 43-49

Publisher

JAPAN SOC TRIBOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.2474/trol.13.43

Keywords

copper; powder molding; friction and wear; unidirectional friction experiment; stress distribution

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16H04504]
  2. JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks, International research core on smart layered materials and structures for energy saving
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04504] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unidirectional friction experiments on uniaxially compressed pure Cu powder were performed to clarify how the solid-phase interparticle bonding proceeds during a powder molding method by applying biaxial force, termed as a compression shearing method at room temperature. Relations among the applied normal load, number of sliding cycles, and microstructural changes of the powder particles were investigated by morphological and cross-sectional observations of the samples after the friction experiments. The structural observations revealed some layered regions with different microstructures within the sample cross-section. All regions increased in size at a higher applied normal load, but their size did not change as the number of the sliding cycles increased. This phenomenon was quantitatively explained by Hamilton and Goodman's model, which showed that the applied normal load correlated with the stress distribution applied to the sample. Tensile stress applied to the powder particles along the sliding direction appeared to be most effective for interparticle bonding. In addition, it was suggested that the bonding process of the powder particles proceeded through the steps: (1) plastic deformation; (2) initially crystal grain refinement to micrometer size; (3) bonding by local sliding between powder particles; and (4) crystal grain refinement to sub-micrometer size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available