4.7 Article

Nanotube Array-Like WO3 Photoanode with Dual-Layer Oxygen-Evolution Cocatalysts for Photoelectrocatalytic Overall Water Splitting

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 1, Issue 12, Pages 6871-6880

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01215

Keywords

WO3-FeOOH/NiOOH; heterojunctions; oxygen-evolution catalyst; photoelectrocatalysis; overall water splitting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207090, 21477079, 21261140333, 21876112, 21876113]
  2. Shanghai Government [15520711300]
  3. PCSIRT [IRT1269]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630981, DXL122, S30406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanotube array-like WO3 (WA) photo anode has been widely utilized in solar-driven photoelectrocatalytic applications due to its excellent light absorption. However, it still suffers from a low quantum efficiency. Herein, double oxygen-evolution catalyst (OEC) layers (FeOOH and NiOOH) were deposited onto the surface of WA with the formation of a WA-FeOOH/NiOOH photoanode (WA-FeNi). The FeOOH greatly decreased the WA/OEC interfacial electron-hole pair recombination rate, while the NiOOH reduced the OEC/electrolyte interfacial electron-hole pairs recombination and promoted the composite's water oxidation activity significantly. The as formed WA-FeNi photoanode possessed a photocurrent density of 120 mu A/cm(3) under simulated sunlight irradiation, which is almost 200% that of WA. The electron-hole separation yield at 0.6 V versus SCE in the former was determined to be 39.3%, which is nearly 2.5 times that of the latter. As a result, the photoanode exhibited superstrong simulated-sunlight-driven photoelectrocatalytic overall water splitting, with a H-2 evolution rate of 3.43 mu mol cm(-2) h(-1). This research provides an effective method for constructing a highly active WO3-based photoelectrocatalytic system for overall water splitting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available