4.2 Article

Systematic assessment of the Leporinus desmotes species complex, with a description of two new species

Journal

NEOTROPICAL ICHTHYOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA ICTIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160166

Keywords

Anostomidae; Characiformes; Morphology; South America; Taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB - 1257898]
  2. Fundacao Araucaria [641/2014]
  3. CNPq [478900/2013-9, 420255/2016-8]
  4. South American Characiformes Inventory [FAPESP 2011/502827]
  5. All Catfish Species Inventory [NSF DEB-0315963]
  6. iXingu Project [NSF DEB-1257813]
  7. National Geographic Committee for Research and Exploration
  8. Aquatic Critter Inc.
  9. Projeto qualificacao taxonomica da base de dados da colecao de peixes do MCT-PUCRS para uso on-line (MCT/CNPq) [45/2012, 504177/2012-5]
  10. Division Of Environmental Biology
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1257813] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of the Leporinus desmotes species complex can be distinguished from other barred or banded congeners by the combination of nine distinct black bars across the head and trunk and long, pointed, laterally compressed and upward curving symphyseal dentary teeth. A taxonomic reassessment of this complex revealed two new species, one from the Orinoco and Negro rivers of Venezuela and Brazil, and the other from the Xingu and Tapajos rivers of Brazil. Both species are similar to L. desmotes and L. jatuncochi, but differ significantly in body shape morphology, coloration, and/or circumpeduncular scale counts. Genetic evidence also contributes to the recognition of both new species. This contribution also maps the geographic distribution of the four known species, and highlights the presence of an unusual meristic polymorphism within Leporinus desmotes sensu stricto that may suggest the presence of even more unrecognized diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available