4.6 Review

Metabolomics for clinical use and research in chronic kidney disease

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 269-284

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.30

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115439, 115317]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Ho 1665/5-1, Ho 1665/5-2, Ho 1665/5-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high prevalence in the general population and is associated with high mortality; a need therefore exists for better biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression and therapy stratification. Moreover, very sensitive biomarkers are needed in drug development and clinical research to increase understanding of the efficacy and safety of potential and existing therapies. Metabolomics analyses can identify and quantify all metabolites present in a given sample, covering hundreds to thousands of metabolites. Sample preparation for metabolomics requires a very fast arrest of biochemical processes. Present key technologies for metabolomics are mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which require sophisticated biostatistic and bioinformatic data analyses. The use of metabolomics has been instrumental in identifying new biomarkers of CKD such as acylcarnitines, glycerolipids, dimethylarginines and metabolites of tryptophan, the citric acid cycle and the urea cycle. Biomarkers such as c-mannosyl tryptophan and pseudouridine have better performance in CKD stratification than does creatinine. Future challenges in metabolomics analyses are prospective studies and deconvolution of CKD biomarkers from those of other diseases such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory conditions, stress and cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available