4.7 Article

Construction of an aerolysin nanopore in a lipid bilayer for single-oligonucleotide analysis

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 1901-1911

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.077

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21421004, 21327807]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B16017]
  3. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [15XD1501200]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201718001, 222201717003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanopore techniques offer the possibility to study biomolecules at the single-molecule level in a low-cost, label-free and high-throughput manner. By analyzing the level, duration and frequency of ionic current blockades, information regarding the structural conformation, mass, length and concentration of single molecules can be obtained in physiological conditions. Aerolysin monomers assemble into small pores that provide a confined space for effective electrochemical control of a single molecule interacting with the pore, which significantly improves the temporal resolution of this technique. In comparison with other reported protein nanopores, aerolysin maintains its functional stability in a wide range of pH conditions, which allows for the direct discrimination of oligonucleotides between 2 and 10 nt in length and the monitoring of the stepwise cleavage of oligonucleotides by exonuclease I (Exo I) in real time. This protocol describes the process of activating proaerolysin using immobilized trypsin to obtain the aerolysin monomer, the construction of a lipid membrane and the insertion of an individual aerolysin nanopore into this membrane. A step-by-step description is provided of how to perform single-oligonucleotide analyses and how to process the acquired data. The total time required for this protocol is similar to 3 d.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available