4.7 Article

Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 828-863

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Zhang laboratory
  2. Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship
  3. Friends of the McGovern Institute Fellowship
  4. Poitras Center for Affective Disorders
  5. DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship
  6. NIH through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [5DP1-MH100706, 1R01-MH110049]
  7. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  8. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
  9. New York Stem Cell Foundation
  10. Simons Foundation
  11. Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
  12. Vallee Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forward genetic screens are powerful tools for the unbiased discovery and functional characterization of specific genetic elements associated with a phenotype of interest. Recently, the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 from the microbial CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) immune system has been adapted for genome-scale screening by combining Cas9 with pooled guide RNA libraries. Here we describe a protocol for genome-scale knockout and transcriptional activation screening using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Custom-or ready-made guide RNA libraries are constructed and packaged into lentiviral vectors for delivery into cells for screening. As each screen is unique, we provide guidelines for determining screening parameters and maintaining sufficient coverage. To validate candidate genes identified by the screen, we further describe strategies for confirming the screening phenotype, as well as genetic perturbation, through analysis of indel rate and transcriptional activation. Beginning with library design, a genome-scale screen can be completed in 9-15 weeks, followed by 4-5 weeks of validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available