4.7 Article

Murine chronic lymph node window for longitudinal intravital lymph node imaging

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1513-1520

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.045

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R00CA137167, DP2OD008780, R01CA163528, R01HL128168]
  2. Center for Biomedical OCT Research and Translation [P41EB015903]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the NIH
  4. National Cancer Institute Federal Share of Proton Income [CA059267]
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research ISF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic imaging windows in mice have been developed to allow intravital microscopy of many different organs and have proven to be of paramount importance in advancing our knowledge of normal and disease processes. A model system that allows long-term intravital imaging of lymph nodes would facilitate the study of cell behavior in lymph nodes during the generation of immune responses in a variety of disease settings and during the formation of metastatic lesions in cancer-bearing mice. We describe a chronic lymph node window (CLNW) surgical preparation that allows intravital imaging of the inguinal lymph node in mice. The CLNCLNCLNW is custom-made from titanium and incorporates a standard coverslip. It allows stable longitudinal imaging without the need for serial surgeries while preserving lymph node blood and lymph flow. We also describe how to build and use an imaging stage specifically designed for the CLNW to prevent (large) rotational changes as well as respiratory movement during imaging. The entire procedure takes approximately half an hour per mouse, and subsequently allows for longitudinal intravital imaging of the murine lymph node and surrounding structures for up to 14 d. Small-animal surgery experience is required to successfully carry out the protocol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available