4.8 Article

Subwavelength coherent imaging of periodic samples using a 13.5 nm tabletop high-harmonic light source

Journal

NATURE PHOTONICS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 259-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2017.33

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency PULSE programme [DARPA-BAA-12-63-FP-004]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Experimental Investigator programme in Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems [GBMF4538]
  3. National Science Foundation Science and Technology Centers (NSF STROBE) [NSF DMR-1548924]
  4. Ford Foundation
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program
  7. Department of Energy STTR/SBIR phase IIB Grant [DE-SC0006514]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006514] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coherent diffractive imaging is unique, being the only route for achieving high spatial resolution in the extreme ultraviolet and X-ray regions, limited only by the wavelength of the light. Recently, advances in coherent short-wavelength light sources, coupled with progress in algorithm development, have significantly enhanced the power of X-ray imaging. However, so far, high-fidelity diffraction imaging of periodic objects has been a challenge because the scattered light is concentrated in isolated peaks. Here, we use tabletop 13.5 nm high-harmonic beams to make two significant advances. First, we demonstrate high-quality imaging of an extended, nearly periodic sample for the first time. Second, we achieve subwavelength spatial resolution (12.6 nm) imaging at short wavelengths, also for the first time. The key to both advances is a novel technique called 'modulus enforced probe', which enables robust and quantitative reconstructions of periodic objects. This work is important for imaging next-generation nano-engineered devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available