4.7 Article

Metal-Organic Framework-74 for Ultratrace Arsenic Removal from Water: Experimental and Density Functional Theory Studies

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages 3283-3292

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00501

Keywords

arsenic removal; metal-organic frameworks; adsorption; nanomaterial; water treatment

Funding

  1. American University of Beirut Research Board
  2. K. Shair Central Research Science Laboratory
  3. Masri Institute [103214]
  4. Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates and compares arsenic, As(V), removal from aqueous media using the water-stable zinc metal-organic frameworks (Zn-MOF-74) prepared via room-temperature precipitation (RT-Zn-MOF-74) and a solvothermal procedure (HT-Zn-MOF-74). The Zn-MOF74 crystals possess average particle sizes of 66 nm and 144 mu m for RT-Zn-MOF-74 and HT-Zn-MOF-74, respectively. Moreover, nanosized RT-Zn-MOF-74 exhibited a superior performance to HT-Zn-MOF-74. While the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of RT-Zn-MOF-74 was smaller than that of HT-Zn-MOF-74, higher adsorption uptake took place on the room-temperature-synthesized ones because of their small particle size and better dispersion. Adsorption isotherm studies showed that the Langmuir isotherm was effective for the adsorption of As(V) onto RT-Zn-MOF-74 and HT-Zn-MOF-74 with maximum adsorption uptake (q(max)) values of 99.0 and 48.7 mg g(-1), respectively. These values exceed most reported maximum adsorption capacities at neutral pH. The thermodynamics of adsorption revealed a spontaneous endothermic process that is due to the substitution of adsorbed water molecules by arsenate in the pores of the MOF crystal. This was further investigated using plane-wave density functional theory calculations. This study constitutes direct evidence for the importance of tuning the size of the MOF crystals to enhance their properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available