4.7 Article

Purine synthesis promotes maintenance of brain tumor initiating cells in glioma

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 661-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4537

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA197718, CA154130, CA169117, CA171652, NS087913, NS089272, CA184090, NS091080, CA168997, CA193256, CA201963]
  2. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  3. Research Programs Committees of the Cleveland Clinic
  4. Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000439]
  5. P&F grant from NIH Resource Center for Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics (RC-SIRM) at University of Kentucky
  6. ENGAGE grant from the National Center for Regenerative Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), also known as cancer stem cells, hijack high-affinity glucose uptake active normally in neurons to maintain energy demands. Here we link metabolic dysregulation in human BTICs to a nexus between MYC and de novo purine synthesis, mediating glucose-sustained anabolic metabolism. Inhibiting purine synthesis abrogated BTIC growth, self-renewal and in vivo tumor formation by depleting intracellular pools of purine nucleotides, supporting purine synthesis as a potential therapeutic point of fragility. In contrast, differentiated glioma cells were unaffected by the targeting of purine biosynthetic enzymes, suggesting selective dependence of BTICs. MYC coordinated the control of purine synthetic enzymes, supporting its role in metabolic reprogramming. Elevated expression of purine synthetic enzymes correlated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients. Collectively, our results suggest that stem-like glioma cells reprogram their metabolism to self-renew and fuel the tumor hierarchy, revealing potential BTIC cancer dependencies amenable to targeted therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available