4.8 Article

Gpr124 is essential for blood-brain barrier integrity in central nervous system disease

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 450-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.4309

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [S10RR025518-01, S10RR027431-01, P50-HG007735, R01HL074267, R01NS064517, U01DK085527, R01CA158528]
  2. American Heart Association [15POST23020039]
  3. Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program (NIGMS) [GM07365]
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Research Fellows Program
  5. American Heart Association Innovative Science Award [12PILT12850014]
  6. Stanford Stroke Collaborative Action Network Pilot Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although blood-brain barrier (BBB) compromise is central to the etiology of diverse central nervous system (CNS) disorders, endothelial receptor proteins that control BBB function are poorly defined. The endothelial G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Gpr124 has been reported to be required for normal forebrain angiogenesis and BBB function in mouse embryos, but the role of this receptor in adult animals is unknown. Here Gpr124 conditional knockout (CKO) in the endothelia of adult mice did not affect homeostatic BBB integrity, but resulted in BBB disruption and microvascular hemorrhage in mouse models of both ischemic stroke and glioblastoma, accompanied by reduced cerebrovascular canonical Wnt-b-catenin signaling. Constitutive activation of Wnt-b-catenin signaling fully corrected the BBB disruption and hemorrhage defects of Gpr124-CKO mice, with rescue of the endothelial gene tight junction, pericyte coverage and extracellular-matrix deficits. We thus identify Gpr124 as an endothelial GPCR specifically required for endothelial Wnt signaling and BBB integrity under pathological conditions in adult mice. This finding implicates Gpr124 as a potential therapeutic target for human CNS disorders characterized by BBB disruption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available