4.8 Article

Regulatory T cells impede acute and long-term immunity to blood-stage malaria through CTLA-4

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1220-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.4395

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease of the National Institutes of Health (NIAID/NIH) [AI42767, AI85515, AI95178, AI100527]
  2. NIAID/NIH [AI125446, AI127481]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Science of the NIH [GM103447]
  4. Division of Intramural Research, NIAID/NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malaria, caused by the protozoan Plasmodium, is a devastating mosquito-borne disease with the potential to affect nearly half the world's population(1). Despite mounting substantial T and B cell responses, humans fail to efficiently control blood-stage malaria or develop sterilizing immunity to reinfections(2). Although forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)(+)CD4(+) regulatory T (T-reg) cells form a part of these responses(3-5), their influence remains disputed and their mode of action is unknown. Here we show that T-reg cells expand in both humans and mice in blood-stage malaria and interfere with conventional T helper cell responses and follicular T helper (T-FH)-B cell interactions in germinal centers. Mechanistically, T-reg cells function in a critical temporal window to impede protective immunity through cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). Targeting T-reg cells or CTLA-4 in this precise window accelerated parasite clearance and generated species-transcending immunity to blood-stage malaria in mice. Our study uncovers a critical mechanism of immunosuppression associated with blood-stage malaria that delays parasite clearance and prevents development of potent adaptive immunity to reinfection. These data also reveal a temporally discrete and potentially therapeutically amenable functional role for T-reg cells and CTLA-4 in limiting antimalarial immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available