4.8 Article

Universal lower limit on vortex creep in superconductors

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 409-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4840

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through the 'Funding Program for World-Leading Innovation R&D on Science and Technology'
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [26709076]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26709076] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superconductors are excellent testbeds for studying vortices, topological excitations that also appear in superfluids, liquid crystals and Bose-Einstein condensates. Vortex motion can be disruptive; it can cause phase transitions(1), glitches in pulsars(2), and losses in superconducting microwave circuits(3), and it limits the current-carrying capacity of superconductors(4). Understanding vortex dynamics is fundamentally and technologically important, and the competition between thermal energy and energy barriers defined by material disorder is not completely understood. Specifically, early measurements of thermally activated vortex motion (creep) in iron-based superconductors unveiled fast rates (S) comparable to measurements of YBa2Cu3O7-delta (refs 5-10). This was puzzling because S is thought to somehow correlate with the Ginzburg number (Gi), and Gi is significantly lower in most iron-based superconductors than in YBa2Cu3O7-delta. Here, we report very slow creep in BaFe2(As0.67P0.33)(2) films, and propose the existence of a universal minimum realizable S similar to Gi(1/2)(T/T-c) (T-c is the superconducting transition temperature) that has been achieved in our films and few other materials, and is violated by none. This limitation provides new clues about designing materials with slow creep and the interplay between material parameters and vortex dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available