4.8 Article

High levels of endocrine pollutants in US streams during low flow due to insufficient wastewater dilution

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 587-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2984

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Arizona State University Decision Center [0951366]
  2. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research [BCS-1026865]
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1462086] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wastewater discharges from publicly owned treatment works are a significant source of endocrine disruptors and other contaminants to the aquatic environment in the US. Although remaining pollutants in wastewater pose environmental risks, treated wastewater is also a primary source of stream flow, which in turn is critical in maintaining many aquatic and riparian wildlife habitats. Here we calculate the dilution factor-the ratio of flow in the stream receiving discharge to the flow of wastewater discharge-for over 14,000 receiving streams in the continental US using streamflow observations and a spatially explicit watershed-scale hydraulic model. We found that wastewater discharges make up more than 50% of in-stream flow for over 900 streams. However, in 1,049 streams that experienced exceptional low-flow conditions, the dilution factors in 635 of those streams fell so low during those conditions that the safety threshold for concentrations of one endocrine disrupting compound was exceeded, and in roughly a third of those streams, the threshold was exceeded for two compounds. We suggest that streams are vulnerable to public wastewater discharge of contaminants under low-flow conditions, at a time when wastewater discharges are likely to be most important for maintaining stream flow for smaller sized river systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available