4.8 Article

Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 184-U132

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2901

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H008136/1, 1498020, ncas10008, ncas10009, NE/J010073/1, ncas10005, NE/K014838/1, ncas10006, NE/J023515/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [NE/J010073/1, ncas10008, NE/K014838/1, NE/H008136/1, ncas10006, NE/J023515/1, ncas10005] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric black carbon makes an important but poorly quantified contribution to the warming of the global atmosphere. Laboratory and modelling studies have shown that the addition of non-black-carbon materials to black-carbon particles may enhance the particles' light absorption by 50 to 60% by refracting and reflecting light. Real-world experimental evidence for this 'lensing' effect is scant and conflicting, showing that absorption enhancements can be less than 5% or as large as 140%. Here we present simultaneous quantifications of the composition and optical properties of individual atmospheric black-carbon particles. We show that particles with a mass ratio of non-black carbon to black carbon of less than 1.5, which is typical of fresh traffic sources, are best represented as having no absorption enhancement. In contrast, black-carbon particles with a ratio greater than 3, which is typical of biomass-burning emissions, are best described assuming optical lensing leading to an absorption enhancement. We introduce a generalized hybrid model approach for estimating scattering and absorption enhancements based on laboratory and atmospheric observations. We conclude that the occurrence of the absorption enhancement of black-carbon particles is determined by the particles' mass ratio of non-black carbon to black carbon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available