4.8 Article

Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 274-278

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2912

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1552519]
  2. NASA [NN14AP38G, NNG14HH42I]
  3. US Department of Energy as part of the Regional & Global Climate Modeling program
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1552519] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1552519] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Desert dust aerosols affect Earth's global energy balance through direct interactions with radiation, and through indirect interactions with clouds and ecosystems. But the magnitudes of these effects are so uncertain that it remains unclear whether atmospheric dust has a netwarming or cooling effect on global climate. Consequently, it is still uncertain whether large changes in atmospheric dust loading over the past century have slowed or accelerated anthropogenic climate change, or what the effects of potential future changes in dust loading will be. Here we present an analysis of the size and abundance of dust aerosols to constrain the direct radiative effect of dust. Using observational data on dust abundance, in situ measurements of dust optical properties and size distribution, and climate and atmospheric chemical transport model simulations of dust lifetime, we find that the dust found in the atmosphere is substantially coarser than represented in current global climate models. As coarse dust warms the climate, the global dust direct radiative effect is likely to be less cooling than the similar to-0.4 W m(-2) estimated by models in a current global aerosol model ensemble. Instead, we constrain the dust direct radiative effect to a range between -0.48 and +0.20 W m(-2), which includes the possibility that dust causes a net warming of the planet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available