4.8 Article

PGBD5 promotes site-specific oncogenic mutations in human tumors

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 1005-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3866

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [K08 CA160660, P30 CA008748, U54 OD020355, UL1 TR000457, P50 CA140146]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2014-60293-R]
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Starr Cancer Consortium
  6. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  7. Sarcoma Foundation of America
  8. Matthew Larson Foundation
  9. Josie Robertson Investigator Program
  10. Rita Allen Foundation
  11. Berliner Krebsgesellschaft e.V.
  12. Berlin Institute of Health
  13. Damon Runyon Richard Lumsden Foundation
  14. Cancer Research UK [18796] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genomic rearrangements are a hallmark of human cancers. Here, we identify the piggyBac transposable element derived 5 (PGBD5) gene as encoding an active DNA transposase expressed in the majority of childhood solid tumors, including lethal rhabdoid tumors. Using assembly-based whole-genome DNA sequencing, we found previously undefined genomic rearrangements in human rhabdoid tumors. These rearrangements involved PGBD5-specific signal (PSS) sequences at their breakpoints and recurrently inactivated tumor-suppressor genes. PGBD5 was physically associated with genomic PSS sequences that were also sufficient to mediate PGBD5-induced DNA rearrangements in rhabdoid tumor cells. Ectopic expression of PGBD5 in primary immortalized human cells was sufficient to promote cell transformation in vivo. This activity required specific catalytic residues in the PGBD5 transposase domain as well as end-joining DNA repair and induced structural rearrangements with PSS breakpoints. These results define PGBD5 as an oncogenic mutator and provide a plausible mechanism for site-specific DNA rearrangements in childhood and adult solid tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available