4.8 Article

Control of intestinal stem cell function and proliferation by mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1027-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3593

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant [1 S10 RR020883-01, 1 S10 RR025532-01A1]
  2. NIH [1 S10OD021505-01]
  3. Biorepository and Molecular Pathology Shared Resource - Cancer Center Support Grant
  4. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30CA042014]
  5. National Cancer Institute [5P30CA042014-24]
  6. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health [1S10RR026802-01]
  7. HHMI
  8. Treadwell
  9. NIH Developmental Biology Training Grant [5T32 HD07491]
  10. University of Utah Graduate Research Fellowship
  11. [RO1GM094232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most differentiated cells convert glucose to pyruvate in the cytosol through glycolysis, followed by pyruvate oxidation in the mitochondria. These processes are linked by the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC), which is required for efficient mitochondrial pyruvate uptake. In contrast, proliferative cells, including many cancer and stem cells, perform glycolysis robustly but limit fractional mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation. We sought to understand the role this transition from glycolysis to pyruvate oxidation plays in stem cell maintenance and differentiation. Loss of the MPC in Lgr5-EGFP-positive stem cells, or treatment of intestinal organoids with an MPC inhibitor, increases proliferation and expands the stem cell compartment. Similarly, genetic deletion of the MPC in Drosophila intestinal stem cells also increases proliferation, whereas MPC overexpression suppresses stem cell proliferation. These data demonstrate that limiting mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism is necessary and sufficient to maintain the proliferation of intestinal stem cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available