4.8 Article

Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago

Journal

NATURE
Volume 547, Issue 7663, Pages 306-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature22968

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP110102864, FT140100101, DP1092843, FT150100138, FL130100116, DE150101597, FT130100195]
  2. DAAD [A/14/01370]
  3. UW-UQ Trans-Pacific Fellowship
  4. UW Royalty Research Fellowship [65-4630]
  5. AINSE [11877]
  6. Wenner Gren Dissertation Fieldwork Grant [Gr. 9260]
  7. Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering [13/003, 15/001]
  8. Australian Government's National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)
  9. Australian Research Council [FT140100101, DE150101597] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time of arrival of people in Australia is an unresolved question. It is relevant to debates about when modern humans first dispersed out of Africa and when their descendants incorporated genetic material from Neanderthals, Denisovans and possibly other hominins. Humans have also been implicated in the extinction of Australia's megafauna. Here we report the results of new excavations conducted at Madjedbebe, a rock shelter in northern Australia. Artefacts in primary depositional context are concentrated in three dense bands, with the stratigraphic integrity of the deposit demonstrated by artefact refits and by optical dating and other analyses of the sediments. Human occupation began around 65,000 years ago, with a distinctive stone tool assemblage including grinding stones, ground ochres, reflective additives and ground-edge hatchet heads. This evidence sets a new minimum age for the arrival of humans in Australia, the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa, and the subsequent interactions of modern humans with Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available