4.8 Article

Rheological separation of the megathrust seismogenic zone and episodic tremor and slip

Journal

NATURE
Volume 543, Issue 7645, Pages 416-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature21389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences' Strategic Priority Research Program [XDA11030102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41406063]
  3. Geological Survey of Canada
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the University of Victoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Episodic tremor and accompanying slow slip, together called ETS, is most often observed in subduction zones of young and warm subducting slabs(1-3). ETS should help us to understand the mechanics of subduction megathrusts(3,4), but its mechanism is still unclear. It is commonly assumed that ETS represents a transition from seismic to aseismic behaviour of the megathrust with increasing depth, but this assumption is in contradiction with an observed spatial separation between the seismogenic zone and the ETS zone(5-8). Here we propose a unifying model for the necessary geological condition of ETS that explains the relationship between the two zones. By developing numerical thermal models, we examine the governing role of thermopetrologically controlled fault zone rheology (frictional versus viscous shear). High temperatures in the warm-slab environment(9) cause the megathrust seismogenic zone to terminate before reaching the depth of the intersection of the continental Mohorovicic discontinuity (Moho) and the subduction interface, called the mantle wedge corner. High pore-fluid pressures around the mantle wedge corner(10) give rise to an isolated friction zone responsible for ETS. Separating the two zones is a segment of semi-frictional or viscous behaviour. The new model reconciles a wide range of seemingly disparate observations and defines a conceptual framework for the study of slip behaviour and the seismogenesis of major faults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available