4.2 Article

Microbiota Protects Mice Against Acute Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury

Journal

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 2313-2323

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12900

Keywords

Microbiome; Alcoholic Liver Disease; Microbiota; Endotoxin; Steatohepatitis

Funding

  1. NIH [K08 DK081830, R01 AA020703, U01 AA021856]
  2. Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development [I01BX002213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Our aim is to investigate the physiological relevance of the intestinal microbiota in alcohol-induced liver injury. Chronic alcohol abuse is associated with intestinal bacterial overgrowth, increased intestinal permeability, and translocation of microbial products from the intestine to the portal circulation and liver. Translocated microbial products contribute to experimental alcoholic liver disease. Methods: We subjected germ-free and conventional C57BL/6 mice to a model of acute alcohol exposure that mimics binge drinking. Results: Germ-free mice showed significantly greater liver injury and inflammation after oral gavage of ethanol (EtOH) compared with conventional mice. In parallel, germ-free mice exhibited increased hepatic steatosis and up-regulated expression of genes involved in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis compared with conventional mice after acute EtOH administration. The absence of microbiota was also associated with increased hepatic expression of EtOH-metabolizing enzymes, which led to faster EtOH elimination from the blood and lower plasma EtOH concentrations. Intestinal levels of EtOH-metabolizing genes showed regional expression differences and were overall higher in germ-free mice relative to conventional mice. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that absence of the intestinal microbiota increases hepatic EtOH metabolism and the susceptibility to binge-like alcohol drinking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available