4.8 Article

Radio frequency negative permittivity in random carbon nanotubes/alumina nanocomposites

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 9, Issue 18, Pages 5779-5787

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr01516j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB643306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602194, 51602195, 51402170]
  3. Science and Technology Development Program of Henan Province [172102410028]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016EMM09]
  5. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While metal is the most common conductive constituent element in the preparation of metamaterials, one-dimensional conductive carbon nanotubes (CNTs) provide alternative building blocks. Here alumina (Al2O3) nanocomposites with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) uniformly dispersed in the alumina matrix were prepared by hot-pressing sintering. As the MWCNT content increased, the formed conductive MWCNT networks led to the occurrence of the percolation phenomenon and a change of the conductive mechanism. Two different types of negative permittivity (i.e., resonance-induced and plasma-like) were observed in the composites. The resonance-induced negative permittivity behavior in the composite with a low nanotube content was ascribed to the induced electric dipole generated from the isolated MWCNTs. The frequency dispersions of such negative permittivity can be fitted well by the Lorentz model, while the observed plasma-like negative permittivity behavior in the composites with MWCNT content exceeding the percolation threshold could be well explained by the low frequency plasmonic state generated from conductive nanotube networks using the Drude model. This work is favorable to revealing the generation mechanism of negative permittivity behavior and will greatly facilitate the practical applications of metamaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available