4.8 Article

Precisely tunable thickness of graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 9, Issue 37, Pages 14103-14110

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr05155g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477050, 21522603]
  2. Chinese-German Cooperation Research Project [GZ1091]
  3. Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Scientific Committee [BK20140011]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0835]
  5. Henry Fok Education Foundation [141068]
  6. Six Talents Peak Project in Jiangsu Province [XCL-025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphitic carbon nitride (GCN) nanosheets with unique physicochemical properties have received increasing attention in the area of photocatalysis, yet tunable thickness for the straightforward production of this graphite-like two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterial remains a challenge. In this work, GCN nanosheets with different thicknesses were firstly prepared by a direct calcination of melamine supramolecular aggregates (MSA) obtained from a hydrochloric acid (HCl)-induced hydrothermal assembly approach. The resultant nanosheets over nanometer scale thickness could be precisely controlled via simply adjusting the HCl concentration. Compared to the bulk GCN (BGCN), the thinner nanosheets possessed a high specific surface area, a large electronic-band structure, and fast charge separation ability. The thinnest nanosheets with a thickness of approximately 4 nm exhibited excellent visible-light-driven photocatalytic water splitting performance in hydrogen evolution (524 mu mol h(-1) g(-1)), which is over 9-fold higher than the BGCN powder. This work provides a thickness-dependent strategy for the preparation of metal-free GCN nanosheets and develops a promising 2D photocatalyst for application in solar energy conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available