4.8 Article

Tissue factor-specific ultra-bright SERRS nanostars for Raman detection of pulmonary micrometastases

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 1110-1119

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr08217c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 EB017748, K08 CA16396]
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRR-29-14]
  3. MSKCC Center for Molecular Imaging & Nanotechnology (CMINT) Grant
  4. MSKCC Technology Development Grant
  5. MSKCC NIH Core Grant [P30-CA008748]
  6. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research
  7. Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we demonstrate a novel application of 'surface enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanoparticles' (SERRS NPs) for imaging breast cancer lung metastases with much higher precision than currently feasible. A breast cancer lung metastasis mouse model was established by intravenous injection of LM2 cells. These mice were intravenously administered SERRS NPs conjugated with ALT-836, an anti-tissue factor (TF) monoclonal antibody, and subjected to Raman imaging to visualize the expression of TF both in vivo and ex vivo. Raman imaging indicated marked uptake of alpha TF-SERRS-NPs by the lung metastases compared to isotype and blocking controls. Conversely, little uptake of aTF-SERRS-NPs was observed in the lungs of healthy mice. Successful detection and delineation of pulmonary micrometastatic lesions as small as 200 mu m, corroborated by histology, immunohistochemistry, and bioluminescence imaging confirmed the suitability of both TF as a target and aTF-SERRS-NPs as an effective contrast agent for imaging breast cancer lung metastases. Further advancements of this technique in the form of Raman endoscopes coupled with ultrabright SERRS NPs developed in this work could lead to minimally invasive detection and resection of lung metastases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available