4.8 Article

Effect of interface on mid-infrared photothermal response of MoS2 thin film grown by pulsed laser deposition

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 3571-3584

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1568-5

Keywords

MoS2; pulsed laser deposition; photothermal effect; infrared (IR) detector; interface

Funding

  1. Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) program [SF0926]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the mid-infrared (mid-IR) photothermal response of multilayer MoS2 thin films grown on crystalline (p-type silicon and c-axis-oriented single crystal sapphire) and amorphous (Si/SiO2 and Si/SiN) substrates by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The photothermal response of the MoS2 films is measured as the changes in the resistance of the MoS2 films when irradiated with a mid-IR (7 to 8.2 mu m) source. We show that enhancing the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) of the MoS2 thin films is possible by controlling the film-substrate interface through a proper choice of substrate and growth conditions. The thin films grown by PLD are characterized using X-ray diffraction, Raman, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images show that the MoS2 films grow on sapphire substrates in a layer-by-layer manner with misfit dislocations. The layer growth morphology is disrupted when the films are grown on substrates with a diamond cubic structure (e.g., silicon) because of twin growth formation. The growth morphology on amorphous substrates, such as Si/SiO2 or Si/SiN, is very different. The PLD-grown MoS2 films on silicon show higher TCR (-2.9% K-1 at 296 K), higher mid-IR sensitivity (Delta R/R = 5.2%), and higher responsivity (8.7 V center dot W-1) compared to both the PLD-grown films on other substrates and the mechanically exfoliated MoS2 flakes transferred to different substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available