4.8 Article

Surface Passivation of GaN Nanowires for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 1520-1528

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04559

Keywords

III-Nitrides; nanowires; surface passivation; photoelectrochemical water-splitting; solar fuel

Funding

  1. [KACST-TIC-R2-FP-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting is a key source of clean and sustainable energy. The use of one-dimensional nanostructures as photoelectrodes is desirable for photo electrochemical water-splitting applications due to the ultralarge surface areas, lateral carrier extraction schemes, and superior light-harvesting capabilities. However, the unavoidable surface states of nanostructured materials create additional charge carrier trapping centers and energy barriers at the semiconductor electrolyte interface, which severely reduce the solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. In this work, we address the issue of surface states in GaN nanowire photoelectrodes by employing a simple and low-cost surface treatment method, which utilizes an organic thiol compound (i.e., 1,2-ethanedithiol). The surface-treated photocathode showed an enhanced photocurrent density of -31 mA/cm(2) at -0.2 V versus RHE with an incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency of 18.3%, whereas untreated nanowires yielded only 8.1% efficiency. Furthermore, the surface passivation provides enhanced photoelectrochemical stability as surface-treated nanowires retained similar to 80% of their initial photocurrent value and produced 8000 pimol of gas molecules over 55 h at acidic conditions (pH similar to 0), whereas the untreated nanowires demonstrated only < 4 h of photoelectrochemical stability. These findings shed new light on the importance of surface passivation of nanostructured photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available