4.8 Article

Effect of Interfacial Alloying versus Volume Scaling on Auger Recombination in Compositionally Graded Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 5607-5613

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02438

Keywords

Semiconductor nanocrystal; quantum dot; suppression of Auger recombination; interfacial alloy layer; lifetime blinking; single-dot spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Chemical Sciences, Biosciences, and Geosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Auger recombination is a nonradiative three particle process wherein the electron-hole recombination energy dissipates as a kinetic energy of a third carrier. Auger decay is enhanced in quantum-dot (QD) forms of semiconductor materials compared to their bulk counterparts. Because this process is detrimental to many prospective applications of the QDs, the development of effective approaches for suppressing Auger recombination has been an important goal in the QD field. One such approach involves smoothing of the confinement potential, which suppresses the intraband transition involved in the dissipation of the electron hole recombination energy. The present study evaluates the effect of increasing smoothness of the confinement potential on Auger decay employing a series of CdSe/CdS-based QDs wherein the core and the shell are separated by an intermediate layer of a CdSexS1-x alloy comprised of 1-5 sublayers with a radially tuned composition. As inferred from single-dot measurements, use of the five-step grading scheme allows for strong suppression of Auger decay for both biexcitons and charged excitons. Further, due to nearly identical emissivities of neutral and charged excitons, these QDs exhibit an interesting phenomenon of lifetime blinking for which random fluctuations of a photoluminescence lifetime occur for a nearly constant emission intensity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available