4.5 Article

Killing Activity of Micafungin Against Candida albicans, C-dubliniensis and Candida africana in the Presence of Human Serum

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 182, Issue 11-12, Pages 979-987

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-017-0178-9

Keywords

RPMI-1640; Time-kill; Killing rate; Echinocandins

Categories

Funding

  1. TAMOP [4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared killing activity of micafungin in time-kill experiments in RPMI-1640 with and without 50% serum against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana reference strains and clinical isolates. Killing rates (k values) were determined for each strain and concentration. In RPMI-1640 MIC ranges were 0.015-0.03, 0.015-0.03 and 0.015 mg/L against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis and C. africana, respectively. In 50% serum MIC values for the three species increased 16- to 64-fold. In RPMI-1640 micafungin was fungicidal against two of three C. albicans isolates at 16 and 32 mg/L within 14.54 h and fungistatic against all C. africana and C. dubliniensis. Fifty per cent serum significantly decreased the growth rate of C. africana, but not of the other two species; weak in vivo replication ability of C. africana was confirmed in murine model. In 50% serum micafungin at 0.25 and 1 mg/L did not inhibit any of the three species (k values were always negative). Micafungin killing rate in 50% serum at 4, 16 and 32 mg/L was significantly decreased for C. albicans, but increased for C. dubliniensis compared to RPMI-1640. Killing activity of micafungin against C. africana was comparable or higher in 50% serum than in RPMI-1640. Although micafungin is a highly protein-bound drug, it was equally effective against the species of the C. albicans complex in 50% serum at therapeutic trough concentration (4 mg/L). Both in vitro and in vivo data confirmed the low virulence of C. africana compared to the two sibling species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available