4.2 Article

Phylogeny of Miracula helgolandica gen. et sp nov and Olpidiopsis drebesii sp nov., two basal oomycete parasitoids of marine diatoms, with notes on the taxonomy of Ectrogella-like species

Journal

MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS
Volume 16, Issue 11-12, Pages 1041-1050

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-017-1345-6

Keywords

Diatom; Oomycetes; Parasitoids; Pathogens; Phylogeny; Taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. LOEWE
  2. Cluster for Integrative Fungal Research
  3. Katholischer Akademischer Auslander-Dienst (KAAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite their widespread nature and economic impact, little is known regarding the diversity and phylogeny of diatom-infecting oomycetes. While the phylogenetic affinities of Lagenisma, affecting large centric diatoms, has recently been resolved, no member of the widespread genus Ectrogella has, so far, been investigated using molecular phylogenetics. The genus Ectrogella contains about a dozen species, which are all holocarpic. The species in the genus are diverse in terms of morphology and development, and primarily set apart from other holocarpic oomycete genera on the basis of their occurrence in unicellular or colonial algae, predominantly licmophoroid and bacillarioid diatoms. Here, we report the phylogenetic placement of two oomycete parasitoids one parasitic to Pseudo-nitzschia pungens and the other parasitic to Rhizosolenia imbricata. While both parasitoids were placed outside the crown oomycete groups represented by Saprolegniomycetes and Peronosporomycetes, they did not form a monophyletic assemblage. The Rhizosolenia parasitoid was embedded amongst marine Olpidiopsis species, while the Pseudo-nitzschia parasitoid was placed as the sister clade to all remaining oomycetes. The taxonomy of Ectrogella-like organisms and Olpidiopsis is discussed and, as a consequence of morphological differences and phylogenetic placement, two new species, Miracula helgolandica and Olpidiopsis drebesii, are introduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available