3.8 Proceedings Paper

Notes on the hybrid URANS/LES turbulence modeling for Internal Combustion Engines simulation

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.047

Keywords

turbulence; hybrid URANS/LES; internal combution engines; CCV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past 20 years, Large Eddy Simulation methods have continuously increased their popularity among the Internal Combustion Engines modeling community, due to their intrinsic potential in the description of the unsteady and randomly generated in-cylinder flow structures. Such capability has gained further relevance in the simulation of modern turbocharged GDI engines, where the high-fidelity resolution of cycle-to-cycle variability phenomena is crucial for the evaluation of the engine performance and emission trends. Nonetheless, even after many years of development the application of standard LES methods to full-scale engine geometries is still not straightforward, due to: the need for specific, turbulence-generating boundary conditions at open ends; more severe grid resolution/quality and time step requirements compared to unsteady RANS; the need for high-order (at least second-order accurate) numerical schemes. Therefore, a viable alternative might be found in hybrid URANS/LES turbulence modeling, which has the potential to achieve adequate scale-resolving levels wherever actually needed, but mitigating at the same time some of the aforementioned concerns. In the present work we discuss the current status and perspectives of URANS/LES hybrids in the ICE field, based on the scientific literature state-of-the art and on a series of previous computational studies made by the authors. Outcomes from this study essentially confirm that this class of methods deserve further attention and will likely support URANS and standard LES in the near future as an effective computational tool for the ICE development and optimization. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available