4.6 Article

Recovery based high capacity reversible data hiding scheme using even-odd embedding

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 77, Issue 12, Pages 15803-15827

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-5156-1

Keywords

Reversible data hiding; Recovery strategy; Location map; Stego-image; Embedding layers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been discussed various data hiding methods which can embed the secret data in an image. However, the image gets destroyed after extraction of the secret data at the receiving end. Thus, there exists a need to have data hiding methods which can recover the image after extraction of the secret data. Such types of schemes are called reversible data hiding schemes which are commonly used in sensitive military, legal, and medical applications. The existing reversible data hiding schemes either provide good hiding capacity but low quality stego-image or good quality stego-image but poor data hiding capacity because the stego-image quality and the hiding capacity are diametrically related metrics. To address this problem, we propose a high capacity reversible data hiding scheme using recovery strategy. It hides the secret data into a cover image in two phases. In the first phase, the cover image is scanned in a specific scan order andconstructs a location map in which even valued pixels are denoted by '1' and odd valued pixels by '0'. It embeds the secret data into every pixel of the image by changing its value at most by 1. The second phase repeats the process of the first phase embedding so that some of the pixels can berecovered to its original form as well as the secret data can further be embedded. Experimentally, it is proved that the proposed scheme provides good quality of stego-image and having the high data hiding capacity at the same time. Further, it is able to maintain the image quality even when the secret data is embedded in layers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available