4.6 Article

Hierarchical CuCo2O4 nanobelts as a supercapacitor electrode with high areal and specific capacitance

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 979-986

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.021

Keywords

Copper cobaltite; nanobelts; supercapacitor; specific capacitance

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) of the Korean government [2009-0093818]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130000138, 2009-0093818] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One dimensional hierarchical CuCo2O4 nanobelt like architecture was synthesized via hydrothermal method. The synthesized nanomaterial was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The TEM image clearly shows the nanobelt like architecture of CuCo2O4. The supercapacitor properties of CuCo2O4 nanobelts electrode were tested using cyclic voltammetry, charge-discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The spinel CuCo2O4 nanobelts exhibit maximum areal and specific capacitance of 2.42 F cm(-2) (809 F g(-1)). After 1800 continuous charge-discharge cycles, 127% of the initial capacitance was retained. This superior electrochemical supercapacitor property is mainly due to increased surface area and ion transport of nanobelt like architecture. The charge transfer resistance (R-ct) value of CuCo2O4 nanobelt electrode is 3.85 Omega. This high capacitance and cyclic stability demonstrate that the prepared CuCo2O4 nanobelts are a promising candidate for supercapacitors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available