4.6 Article

Employment of Chitosan-linked Iron Oxides as Mesoporous Anode Materials for Improved Lithium-ion Batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 146-153

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.132

Keywords

Iron oxides; Li-ion battery; Chitosan; Mesoporous

Funding

  1. KIST institutional program
  2. National Research Foundation under Ministry of Science, ICT Future, Korea [NRF-012M1A2A2671792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the concentration effect of chitosan on the formation of iron oxide composites and their electrochemical performance as anode materials in Li-ion batteries. The molecular bridging effect of chitosan chains induces the clustered aggregation of citrate-capped Fe3O4 (C-Fe3O4) through the electrostatic interactions between carboxylate groups of C-Fe3O4 and amine groups of chitosan. The thermal calcination of chitosan-linked Fe3O4 leads to carbon-coated Fe2O3 (Fe2O3@carbon) with the mesopore range of porosity (20-30 nm). The mesoporous Fe2O3@carbon exhibits an improved electrochemical performance as anode materials in Li-ion batteries. The capacity retention of Fe2O3@carbon is twice that of bare Fe2O3 after the 50th cycle at 0.1 C. During the charge-discharge process, the Fe2O3@carbon (3 ml of chitosan) exhibits the highest retention capacity among as-prepared samples, whereas Fe2O3@carbon (1 ml of chitosan) exhibits the lowest retention capacity owing to the weakly cross-linked iron oxides. The improved performance of Fe2O3@carbon as anode materials is mainly attributed to the optimal cross-linking effect and structural integrity of mesoporous composite which is beneficial for the effective transport of electrolytes and/or Li-ons, suggesting a useful guideline for preparing porous electrode materials using metal oxide particles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available