4.6 Article

Intestinal epithelial cell-specific RARα depletion results in aberrant epithelial cell homeostasis and underdeveloped immune system

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 703-715

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2017.91

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Fellowship [201100215]
  2. Samana Cay MGH Research Scholar Fund [R01-AI084880]
  3. Helmsley Trust
  4. NIH [DK097485, DK062432, DK086502]
  5. Swedish Research Council VR grant [K2015-68X-22765-01-6]
  6. Wallenberg Academy Fellow (WAF) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinoic acid (RA), a dietary vitamin A metabolite, is crucial in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. RA acts on intestinal leukocytes to modulate their lineage commitment and function. Although the role of RA has been characterized in immune cells, whether intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) rely on RA signaling to exert their immune-regulatory function has not been examined. Here we demonstrate that lack of RA receptor alpha(RAR alpha) signaling in IECs results in deregulated epithelial lineage specification, leading to increased numbers of goblet cells and Paneth cells. Mechanistically, lack of RAR alpha resulted in increased KLF4(+) goblet cell precursors in the distal bowel, whereas RA treatment inhibited klf4 expression and goblet cell differentiation in zebrafish. These changes in secretory cells are associated with increased Reg3g, reduced luminal bacterial detection, and an underdeveloped intestinal immune system, as evidenced by an almost complete absence of lymphoid follicles and gut resident mononuclear phagocytes. This underdeveloped intestinal immune system shows a decreased ability to clear infection with Citrobacter rodentium. Collectively, our findings indicate that epithelial cell-intrinsic RARa signaling is critical to the global development of the intestinal immune system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available