4.6 Article

Three-dimensional molecular and nanoparticle crystallization by DNA nanotechnology

Journal

MRS BULLETIN
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 904-912

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2017.280

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS [GM-29554]
  2. NSF [EFRI-1332411, CCF-1526650]
  3. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiatives (MURI) from the Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0024]
  4. MURI from the Office of Naval Research [N000140911118]
  5. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0007991]
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3849]
  7. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0008772]
  8. US DOE Office of Science Facility [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural DNA nanotechnology has been particularly driven toward three-dimensional (3D) construction since its inception at the start of the 1980s. Part of the driving force was the goal of building specific crystals from macromolecular components, without having to use trial and error for determining appropriate crystallization conditions. With the first demonstration of DNA attachment to gold nanoparticles in the 1990s, DNA became a player in inorganic nanomaterials as a programmable agent for structure assembly. For pure DNA structures, the crystallization goal has been mediated by sticky-ended cohesion with some success, although trial and error crystallizations have produced better diffracting crystals than those directed self-assembly. For nanoparticles, different types of 3D nanoscale crystalline organizations have been realized. Recent efforts not only expand the diversity of particle lattices, but also strive to achieve designed lattice symmetries and their transformations. In this article, we review the development of 3D assembly of DNA and DNA-guided nanoparticle arrays, the issues that have prevented and facilitated formation of such structures, and recent strategies toward this goal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available