4.7 Article

A population of faint low surface brightness galaxies in the Perseus cluster core

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 470, Issue 2, Pages 1512-1525

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1229

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: individual: Perseus; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: photometry

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-1664362]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias [2012B/045]
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1664362] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the detection of 89 low surface brightness (LSB), and thus low stellar density galaxy candidates in the Perseus cluster core, of the kind named 'ultra-diffuse galaxies', with mean effective V-band surface brightnesses 24.8-27.1 mag arcsec-2, total V-band magnitudes -11.8 to -15.5 mag, and half-light radii 0.7-4.1 kpc. The candidates have been identified in a deep mosaic covering 0.3 deg(2), based on wide-field imaging data obtained with the William Herschel Telescope. We find that the LSB galaxy population is depleted in the cluster centre and only very few LSB candidates have half-light radii larger than 3 kpc. This appears consistent with an estimate of their tidal radius, which does not reach beyond the stellar extent even if we assume a high dark matter content (M/L = 100). In fact, three of our candidates seem to be associated with tidal streams, which points to their current disruption. Given that published data on faint LSB candidates in the Coma cluster - with its comparable central density to Perseus - show the same dearth of large objects in the core region, we conclude that these cannot survive the strong tides in the centres of massive clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available