4.7 Article

Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-α forest

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 471, Issue 4, Pages 4606-4614

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1870

Keywords

dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Royal Astronomical Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

If a significant fraction of the dark matter in the Universe is made of an ultra-light scalar field, named fuzzy dark matter (FDM) with a mass m(a) of the order of 10(-22)-10(-21) eV, then its de Broglie wavelength is large enough to impact the physics of large-scale structure formation. In particular, the associated cut-off in the linear matter power spectrum modifies the structure of the intergalactic medium (IGM) at the scales probed by the Lyman-alpha forest of distant quasars. We study this effect by making use of dedicated cosmological simulations which take into account the hydrodynamics of the IGM. We explore heuristically the amplitude of quantum pressure for the FDM masses considered here and conclude that quantum effects should not modify significantly the non-linear evolution of matter density at the scales relevant to the measured Lyman-alpha flux power, and for m(a) greater than or similar to 10(-22) eV. We derive a scaling law between m(a) and the mass of the well-studied thermal warm dark matter model that is best adapted to the Lyman-alpha forest data, and differs significantly from the one inferred by a simple linear extrapolation. By comparing FDM simulations with the Lyman-alpha flux power spectra determined from the BOSS survey, and marginalizing over relevant nuisance parameters, we exclude FDM masses in the range 10(-22) less than or similar to m(a) < 2.3 x 10(-21) eV at 95 per cent CL. Adding higher resolution Lyman-alpha spectra extends the exclusion range up to 2.9 x 10(-21) eV. This provides a significant constraint on FDM models tailored to solve the 'small-scale problems' of Lambda CDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available