4.6 Article

A design strategy of large grain lithium-rich layered oxides for lithium-ion batteries cathode

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 131-138

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.061

Keywords

Large grain; Lithium ion battery; Cathode material; Cyclic stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376001]
  2. Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project [YETP1205]
  3. Foundation for Basic Research of Beijing Institute of Technology [20141042003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-rich materials are considered the most promising for Li-ion battery cathodes, as high capacity can be achieved. However, poor cycling stability is a critical drawback that leads to poor capacity retention. Here a strategy is used to synthesize a large-grain lithium-rich layered oxides to overcome this difficulty without sacrificing rate capability. This material is designed with micron scale grain with a width of about 300 nm and length of 1-3 mu m. This unique structure has a better ability to overcome stress-induced structural collapse caused by Li-ion insertion/extraction and reduce the dissolution of Mn ions, which enable a reversible and stable capacity. As a result, this cathode material delivered a highest discharge capacity of around 308 mAh g (1) at a current density of 30 mAg (1) with retention of 88.3% (according to the highest discharge capacity) after 100 cycles, 190 mAhg (1) at a current density of 300 mA g (1) and almost no capacity fading after 100 cycles. Therefore, Lithium-rich material of large-grain structure is a promising cathode candidate in Lithium-ion batteries with high capacity and high cycle stability for application. This strategy of large grain may furthermore open the door to synthesize the other complex architectures for various applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available