4.7 Article

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering - towards an accurate model

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 471, Issue 2, Pages 2370-2390

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1641

Keywords

cosmological parameters; distance scale; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN's Consolider-Ingenio Programme under grant MultiDark [CSD2009-00064, AYA2010-21231-C02-01]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [HEPHACOS S2009/ESP-1473]
  3. MINECO [AYA2012-39702- C02-01]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST) [NRF-SGER 2014055950]
  5. faculty research fund of Sejong University
  6. Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica (PAPITT) [IA102516]
  7. Proyecto Conacyt Fronteras [281]
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  9. National Science Foundation
  10. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  11. University of Arizona
  12. Brazilian Participation Group
  13. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  14. Carnegie Mellon University
  15. University of Florida
  16. French Participation Group
  17. German Participation Group
  18. Harvard University
  19. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  20. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  21. Johns Hopkins University
  22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  23. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  24. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  25. New Mexico State University
  26. New York University
  27. Ohio State University
  28. Pennsylvania State University
  29. University of Portsmouth
  30. Princeton University
  31. Spanish Participation Group
  32. University of Tokyo
  33. University of Utah
  34. Vanderbilt University
  35. University of Virginia
  36. University of Washington
  37. Yale University
  38. [LANCAD-UNAM-DGTIC-319]
  39. STFC [ST/K004719/1, ST/N000668/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  40. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000668/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  41. UK Space Agency [ST/N00180X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyse the broad-range shape of the monopole and quadrupole correlation functions of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12 (DR12) CMASS and LOWZ galaxy sample to obtain constraints on the Hubble expansion rate H(z), the angular-diameter distance D-A(z), the normalized growth rate f(z) sigma(8)(z) and the physical matter density Omega(m) h(2). We adopt wide and flat priors on all model parameters in order to ensure the results are those of a ` single-probe' galaxy clustering analysis. We also marginalize over three nuisance terms that account for potential observational systematics affecting the measured monopole. However, such Monte Carlo Markov Chain analysis is computationally expensive for advanced theoretical models. We develop a new methodology to speed up the analysis. Using the range 40 h(-1) Mpc < s < 180 h(-1) Mpc, we obtain {DA(z) r(s,fid)/ r(s) (Mpc), H(z) r(s)/r(s),(fid) km s(-1) Mpc(-1), f(z)sigma 8(z)Omega(m)h(2)} = {956 +/- 28, 75.0 +/- 4.0, 0.397 +/- 0.073, 0.143 +/- 0.017} at z = 0.32 and {1421 +/- 23, 96.7 +/- 2.7, 0.497 +/- 0.058, 0.137 +/- 0.015} at z = 0.59 where r(s) is the comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch and r(s,fid) = 147.66 Mpc for the fiducial cosmology used in this study. Combining our measurements with Planck data, we obtain Omega(m) = 0.306 +/- 0.009, H-0 = 67.9 +/- 0.7 kms(-1) Mpc(-1) and sigma(8) = 0.815 +/- 0.009 assuming Lambda cold dark matter (CDM); Omega(k) = 0.000 +/- 0.003 and w= -1.02 +/- 0.08 assuming owCDM. Our results show no tension with the flat Lambda CDM cosmological paradigm. This paper is part of a set that analyses the final galaxy clustering data set from Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available