4.7 Article

The search for multiple populations in Magellanic Cloud Clusters - III. No evidence for multiple populations in the SMC cluster NGC 419

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 468, Issue 3, Pages 3150-3158

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx660

Keywords

stars: abundances; Hertzsprung-Russell and colour-magnitude diagrams; galaxies: individual: SMC; galaxies: star clusters: individual: NGC 419

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-GO-14069, NAS526555]
  2. Royal Society
  3. European Research Council [ERC-CoG-646928-Multi-Pop]
  4. Chilean BASAL Centro de Excelencia en Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA) grant [PFB-06/2007]
  5. STFC [ST/L00061X/1, ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00061X/1, ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the third paper about our ongoing Hubble Space Telescope survey for the search for multiple stellar populations (MPs) within Magellanic Cloud clusters. We report here the analysis of NGC 419, an similar to 1.5 Gyr old, massive (greater than or similar to 2 x 10(5) M-circle dot) star cluster in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). By comparing our photometric data with stellar isochrones, we set a limit on [N/Fe] enhancement of less than or similar to+0.5 dex and hence we find that no MPs are detected in this cluster. This is surprising because in the first two papers of this series, we found evidence for MPs in four other SMC clusters (NGC 121; Lindsay 1, NGC 339, NGC 416), aged from 6 Gyr up to similar to 10-11 Gyr. This finding raises the question whether age could play a major role in the MPs phenomenon. Additionally, our results appear to exclude mass or environment as the only key factors regulating the existence of a chemical enrichment, since all clusters studied so far in this survey are equally massive (similar to 1-2 x 10(5) M-circle dot) and no particular patterns are found when looking at their spatial distribution in the SMC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available