4.7 Article

New insights into the origin and evolution of the old, metal-rich open cluster NGC 6791

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2739

Keywords

Galaxy: disc; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; open clusters and associations: general; open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 6791; Galaxy: structure

Funding

  1. CONACYT Ciencia Basica grant [255167]
  2. DGAPA PAPIIT [IG 100115]
  3. DGAPA-PAPIIT [IN-109716]
  4. DGAPA-UNAM
  5. Royal Society (University Research Fellowship)
  6. European Research Council (CLUSTERS) [ERC StG-335936]
  7. ERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NGC 6791 is one of the most studied open clusters, it is massive (similar to 5000M(circle dot)), located at the solar circle, old (similar to 8 Gyr) and yet the most metal-rich cluster ([Fe/H] similar or equal to 0.4) known in the Milky Way. By performing an orbital analysis within a Galactic model including spiral arms and a bar, we found that it is plausible that NGC 6791 formed in the inner thin disc or in the bulge, and later displaced by radial migration to its current orbit. We apply different tools to simulate NGC 6791, including direct N-body summation in time-varying potentials, to test its survivability when going through different Galactic environments. In order to survive the 8-Gyr journey moving on a migrating orbit, NGC 6791 must have been more massive, M-0 >= 5 x 10(4) M-circle dot, when formed. We find independent confirmation of this initial mass in the stellar mass function, which is observed to be flat; this can only be explained if the average tidal field strength experienced by the cluster is stronger than what it is at its current orbit. Therefore, the birth place and journeys of NGC 6791 are imprinted in its chemical composition, in its mass-loss and in its flat stellar mass function, supporting its origin in the inner thin disc or in the bulge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available