4.7 Article

A test for skewed distributions of dark matter, and a possible detection in galaxy cluster Abell 3827

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 468, Issue 4, Pages 5004-5013

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx855

Keywords

astroparticle physics; gravitational lensing: strong; galaxies: clusters: individual: Abell 3827; dark matter

Funding

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  2. Royal Society
  3. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H005234/1, ST/L00075X/1]
  4. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  5. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory programmes [294.A-5014, 295.A-5018]
  6. BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant [ST/K00042X/1]
  7. STFC capital grant [ST/H008519/1]
  8. STFC DiRAC Operations grant [ST/K003267/1]
  9. Durham University
  10. STFC [ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/L00075X/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/H005234/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H005234/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulations of self-interacting dark matter predict that dark matter should lag behind galaxies during a collision. If the interaction is mediated by a high-mass force carrier, the distribution of dark matter can also develop asymmetric dark matter tails. To search for this asymmetry, we compute the gravitational lensing properties of a mass distribution with a free skewness parameter. We apply this to the dark matter around the four central galaxies in cluster Abell 3827. In the galaxy whose dark matter peak has previously been found to be offset, we tentatively measure a skewness s = 0.23(-0.22)(+0.05) in the same direction as the peak offset. Our method may be useful in future gravitational lensing analyses of colliding galaxy clusters and merging galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available